Intelligence

So, you may have heard of a little show coming on tonight, called Intelligence. It's about a cocky special agent who just happens to have a chip in his head. This chip lets him access everything online, including stuff that requires hacking. He has to be tightly monitored, because, of course, he's reckless, and likely to get himself killed. Why do they always put chips in guys like this?

It sounds kind of boring, doesn't it? Except for one thing:

The holder of the chip is played by Josh Holloway. You heard that right. Sawyer himself. This means I'll be watching. Maybe not tonight, since it is DVRed, but I will be watching, despite the middling reviews it has gotten. Because, you see, I miss seeing that face on television. And as I posted on my Lost blog, Holloway turned out to be a pretty good actor.

But I now have a question. Do I miss seeing Sawyer?

Or do I miss Josh Holloway? 

Well, we'll see. I'm sure I'll share my conclusions soon.

Lost Fan Alert: okay, really? 

The Mythology of Battlestar Galactica

Spoiler warning: if you've not watched Battlestar Galactica and you hope to, without being totally spoiled, don't read this post!

I didn't realize when I linked to my last post on Battlestar Galactica that I would start an impassioned discussion on the qualities of the two versions of Battlestar Galactica. In reading the discussion, my friend P added something that I feel deserves further exploration. Here is his post:


...One of the continuing themes (indeed, the overarching theme) in the reboot is that of the Eternal Return--"All of this has happened before and all of this will happen again." With this in mind, the reboot doesn't need to be absolutely true to the original, as it is not a retelling of the original story. It is a telling of a different iteration....

The characters in the reboot--including the Cylons--are not merely journeying to Earth, they are each on their own personal journey.

The reboot isn't perfect--there is a lack of plotting and overall story arc that makes things like the reveal of the Final Five seem like they just pulled the names out of a hat and then retconned the character's back stories. Other than that, IMHO, the reboot is superior to the original in every way.


P was basically defending himself as to why he thought the reboot was better than the original. I've edited out a lot (but feel compelled to leave in his criticisms of the reboot). What he touched on, however, was one thing I left out of my original post that added so much to the reboot, and that is the mythology of the show.

I haven't talked a lot about Star Trek: Deep Space Nine (I'll call it DS9 for brevity) before, but it is my favorite of the new Star Treks. What I loved about it drove a lot of people crazy: the mythology. Because the space station was stuck in one place, the show had time to fully explore Bajor, including it politics and religious beliefs. The mythology suffused the show, and added a depth and texture lacking in most modern dramas.

The mythology that was added into Battlestar Galactica was an unexpected pleasure. Some of this was found in the original series, but there it seemed like it was just window dressing. In the series, the humans believe in twelve gods that seem based on the Greek gods. The Cylons, however, believe in the one true God, and Head Six's conversion of Baltar from atheist to true believer (and he was a true believer) is one of the best parts of the show. I didn't touch on this in my original post, because it's a little spoilerific, but Baltar's entire journey into his beliefs and his role in them is a fantastic plot.

Had I watched BSG (I'm getting a little lazy now!) from the beginning, or if I had not binged watched the show as I did, I probably would have produced quite a few more posst exploring the more interesting parts of the show, including the mythology. Other questions I would have explored (and may still) include the humanity of the Cylons, what the treatment of captive Cylons says about the humanity of the humans, Baltar's journey, the President's journey, Cylon politics, Kara Thrace's journey...well, it goes on. However, I still have to finish the show!

Maybe I'll name a male cat Malcolm after Mal Reynolds on Firefly?

If I Can't Be Buffy Summers When I Grow Up, I'll Be Twilight Sparkle

Picture the scene. It's a dank room, with faded streamers and deflated balloons strewn around. A bunch of embarrassed people are seated in chairs in a semi-circle. I step up to the podium. "Hello, my name is Carol, and I'm a bronette." The group shuffles shamefacedly as they declare, "Hi Carol."

Yes, I'm a bronette.

If you're like I was, just a short year ago, you would have no idea what I'm talking about. I'm talking about My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic.

I never intended for this to happen. It all started innocently enough. B and I went on a date, and our daughter, N, (don't ask - it's complicated) babysat. And she turned the television on to the Hub and My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic. The next day, my children, boy and girl, demanded to watch "the ponies". We sighed, we moaned, we gave in and coped.

And one day, we realized, hey, this isn't so bad. We then later realized, hey, this is pretty good.

Let me give you a little background. Equestria is a country with earth ponies, unicorns, and pegasi, ruled by a very, very old (but young looking!) Princess Celestia. Her most faithful student is Twilight Sparkle, a brilliant but socially awkward unicorn who is assisted by a green baby dragon (I didn't say this is based in reality). Princess Celestia sends Twilight to Ponyville, with an unusual assignment - learn about friendship. She meets five ponies there, and becomes friends with them. She discovers, to her surprise, that she and her friends represent the powerful Elements of Harmony.

Applejack represents honesty. She speaks with a Southern twang and runs an apple farm with Granny Smith, Big Macintosh, and Apple Bloom. She's forthright, plain-spoken, and hardworking.

Pinkie Pie represents laughter. Born on a rock farm, she realizes she has a passion for parties. Her goal is to make everyone happy, and she's pretty much friends with everyone.

Rarity represents generosity. She's a fashion designer with a gift for making the world a little more beautiful.

Fluttershy represents kindness. She communicates with animals and has a soft and gentle manner.

Rainbow Dash represents loyalty. She's an athletic tomboy who wants to join the Wonderbolts.

And Twilight represents magic.

I didn't want to leave out Spike, Twilight's dragon friend. He provides a lot of comic relief, often through his sarcastic one-liners.

I'm sure you think I've lost my touch on reason at this point. What in the world is wrong with me? But like the best in cartoons, MLP (as we've taken to calling it) provides more than entertainment for children. The stories appeal to children, but they do to adults as well, because they are funny and don't take themselves too seriously. They've referenced Music Man, Indiana Jones, and The Big Lebowski. And who can't love it when they hire John DeLancie to provide the voice of Discord, a chaos demon?

But there's more. I love the fact that the main characters are all strong characters in their own right. They aren't all interested in shopping, cooking, or boys. The only one interested in finding her prince is Rarity, but when she finds one and he treats her like a door mat, she lets him know exactly what she thinks (and even smashes the glass slipper she left behind to prevent him from finding her!). Rainbow Dash is a typical tomboy, tough and competitive, with no time for boys (except to rescue them when they need it). But neither one of these extremes is promoted as superior to the other. Rarity demonstrates that even if she wants to be a lady she can still take care of herself, as the Diamond Dogs discovered after kidnapping her. Rainbow Dash thinks reading is for sissies and eggheads, until she finds herself with nothing to do in the hospital. I don't know what my daughter will be like, and I want her to be able to explore all aspects of herself, not just a limited idea of what femininity is. I like that the ponies are all so different and yet, so okay.

I also like that the ponies aren't smart-mouthed brats who are smarter than their clueless out-of-touch parents. Instead, they work together, and if there is conflict, it is based on character differences (see Rarity and Applejack learn they can be friends even though they are so different). The friendship between the ponies is important, and I really like what it is saying about being friends.

But I'm a little unnerved that I've joined a seemingly clandestine group of adults who like this show. It appears that most are male, many of them fathers of their own pony-loving children. There are many websites devoted to the show, most run by males. And one man even found that being a brony can get you get you fired (and being a brony is not a protected class). Why does it make us uncomfortable for men to be fascinated by this show? Although they don't appear to be predators, I guess their love of MLP makes them seem so. All I know is I will not make a picture of Rainbow Dash as my screensaver at work any time soon.

The Hub aired a MLP special over the fall in which Twilight Sparkle went through a magic portal to a world in which she and her friends were all humans. The kind of humans where the girls had teeny bodies and big heads. I didn't live the images as much, but the focus was still on the friendship, so it wasn't too bad.

The show airs on the Hub, the channel owned and operated by Hasbro, a toy company. Yes, the show is designed to make you want to buy their products. Yes, we have a number of My Little Pony ponies. Yes, you can comb their hair. Yes, we bought MLP bandages. Oh, well.

Be that as it may, we'll keep watching MLP. We usually watch On Demand (and have bought the first two seasons on DVD), so we get minimal commercials. And we aren't going to stop, until our children tell us they don't want to watch it anymore. (Seriously, did you think the two adults watched it on our own?).

Star Trek: TNG Fan Alert: John DeLancie, Q, is the voice of Discord. He also narrated a DVD on bronies (which I don't own!).

Catching Up On....Battlestar Galactica

So, "Catching Up On..." is a new segment for when I want to write about a show that I didn't watch when it was originally on. Thanks to the wonders of Netflix (my new favorite!), I have a whole host of entire seasons of shows waiting for me to watch. I'm starting with Battlestar Galactica.

First, my excuse for not watching it when it was first on. According to Wikipedia, the rebooted Battlestar Galactica aired its opening miniseries in 2003, right during the time I was studying for my first set of law school final exams. Exams are never easy, and law school exams are particularly strenuous. I had no idea what to expect. I certainly wasn't going to watch a miniseries based on a television show that wasn't all that great when it first aired. The first season aired during the Fall of 2004. You may have heard of another show that started at the same time: Lost. I hadn't seen the miniseries, and I never tried to catch up.

I was surprised to read and hear how fabulous the reboot was. The original show was mildly entertaining, but it had as much depth as a party princess. The reboot, on the other hand, was serialized, had a dark tone, and existed on multiple layers. Themes abounded. In other words, it sounded like a show I would love, the original be damned.

What cinched it was this. I posted on Facebook how obsessed I was with Lost. A friend of mine, I'll call him "P", responded that he was feeling the same way about Battlestar Galactica. I was annoyed by his post, as I was all about Lost at the time, but I filed it away for the future. "P" might have annoyed me, but he has good taste in television.

Fast forward to 2013. B and I have bought a "smart" television and signed up for Netflix. Spotting Battlestar Galactica, I save it on my list. Thanks to what I'm now calling "preschool crud", I was home for an entire week, wishing for an early death. I was also binge-watching Battlestar Galactica. It is every bit as good as I thought it would be. It's got science fiction, it's got mythology, it's got beautiful people, it's got great characters, it's got suspense. It was like a book I couldn't put down (which is a problem with binge-watching).

I'm currently at the beginning of Season 4, the final season.  I don't know how long it will take me to finish, but as much as I'm looking forward to it, I'm also going to be sad when it is over.

A brief overview of the plot (if you need it): humans created Cylons, who eventually turned on them. After a 40-year truce, the Cylons invade, and with the unwitting help of a randy scientist, are able to ride over the defenses of the Twelve Colonies. The Colonies are destroyed in a nuclear holocaust, while computer viruses make the battlestars and other spaceships inert, and easy victim to the Cylons. Humanity is almost wiped out. Only the fact that Battlestar Galactica was too antiquated to be wired into the system that was infected by the virus kept it from being similarly defenseless. A ragtag group of survivors in various types of spaceships try to find Earth, the missing thirteenth colony.

In the meantime, here are some initial thoughts, trying to keep the spoilers down (don't worry, I'll write a spoiler-laden post soon).

1. Edward James Olmos.

I've been afraid of this man since his taciturn Martin Castillo in Miami Vice. One glance, and it seems that he has weighed your soul and found it wanting. In Battlestar Galactica, he is just as intense, but he's a bit less of a cypher. Olmos takes over from Lorne Greene, playing William Adama, the commander of Battlestar Galactica when the Cylons attack. His divorce has haunted him, one son has died, and his remaining son won't forgive him for that son's death. (Adama in the original series also had a daughter, Athena, but she doesn't exist in the reboot). But in the crisis of the Cylon attack, he is a major force in keeping the survivors together. Watching Olmos bring Adama to life is a treat and one of the best parts of the show.

2. Two characters I adore: Starbuck and Gaius Baltar

First, Starbuck. In the original series, Starbuck was played by Dirk Benedict, who is male. The reboot rebooted Starbuck, by making the character female, much to Benedict's disgust.  Other than gender, the two are remarkably the same. Both smoke cigars, both are hotshot pilots - the best in the fleet, both are sexually active, both flout authority. But as played by Katee Sackhoff, Starbuck became a fantastic character.

Kara "Starbuck" Thrace is more than just a tough pilot. She cares deeply about the people in her life, but makes some really bad and impulsive decisions. She flees from emotional intimacy, drinks too much, and acts before thinking. But what gets me are her eyes. Her facial expression may say she doesn't care, but her eyes prove differently. She acts like she doesn't feel deeply, but in reality, she does.

If my next cat is female, I'm naming her Starbuck.

Baltar in the original series was a moustache-twirling villain who sold out the humans to the Cylons for power and whatever it is that one-dimensional villains want. In the reboot, Gaius Baltar turned into a much more complicated figure. He didn't exactly betray the humans to the Cylons, he just wanted to get into a pretty girl's pants. He had no idea the pretty girl was a Cylon who was using Baltar to get the security codes to the Colonies' defenses.

Baltar is a fabulous character. He's vain, he's a coward, he's brilliant, he's conniving. Actually, all that sounds like he's a typical villain. So I'm clearly not doing my job. Because he's more than that. He's cynical, sarcastic, insightful, sometimes caring and sometimes harsh, but he's always intriguing. He's an unpredictable character and his presence is always appreciated.

As much as I love the character, I am not naming a male cat Gaius Baltar.

3. Tricky roles for actresses: Tricia Helfer and Grace Park

The tricky thing about Cylons is that they have somehow managed to create Cylons that look just like humans. There are twelve models, two of whom are in the main cast of characters. Tricia Helfer plays Six. One of the Sixes was sent to Caprica to get the security codes from Baltar. Another was on the Pegasus, trying to get its security codes (it was offline when the Cylons sent the virus through the systems). Baltar finds himself haunted by another Six, who can only be seen by Baltar.

Grace Park plays Eight. One is on Galactica - Sharon "Boomer" Valerii. Unlike the Sixes, Boomer at first has no idea she's a Cylon, until it is too late. Sharon "Athena" Agathon knows she's a Cylon, but she's imprinted with Boomer's memories so she can seduce Karl Agathon.

Despite the fact that the Sixes are the same and the Eights are the same, somehow, their experiences have made them different. Caprica Six is different from the Six that was raped and tortured on the Pegasus. Helfer managed to make each iteration of Six unique. Caprica Six, Gina (the Pegasus Six), and Head Six (Baltar's Six) each have their own personalities, and I can always tell which one is which, just by the way she carries herself and her facial expressions.

Grace Park struggled a bit more, perhaps because the differences between Boomer and Athena were less pronounced (remember, Athena had Boomer's memories). However, she did a fine job, and I wonder if she finds her current gig on Hawaii Five-0 to be somewhat dull in comparison.

4. Danged spoilers.

This is a hazard if you are watching serialized shows that have already aired and read a lot on television. I went in knowing a few things that I shouldn't have, but it turns out that most of what I knew I would have known if I had seen the entire miniseries. But right before I was about to start the third season, I read a TV Guide article about the 50 biggest surprises on television and read something about Battlestar Galactica that truly did surprise me. Because it hadn't happened yet. This meant that as I watched, I was able to pick up on all the hints that I probably wouldn't have picked up on before. Has it ruined my enjoyment? I don't know. It's a different level of enjoyment, I believe.

Finally...most of the actors I'd never heard of before Battlestar Galactica aired, but many have moved on to other roles.

Hawaii Five-0 fan alert: Grace Park played Boomer on Battlestar Galactica, a character that was originally male. She did a similar gender switch in another reboot, Hawaii Five-0, where she plays Kono.

Dollhouse fan alert: Tahmoh Penikett, "Helo", played Paul Ballard on Dollhouse, an FBI agent who's obsession with the doll Echo led to his expulsion from the FBI.

Flashforward fan alert (were there any of these?): James Callis, the brilliant and beloved by me Baltar, played a character at the tail end of Flashfoward. I had long stopped watching by that time.

Major Crimes fan alert: Mary McDonnell, President Roslin, plays Sharon Raydor on both The Closer and its spin-off, Major Crimes.  I get a little confused at times when watching Battlestar Galactica, since they too have a major character known as "Sharon".

24 fan alert: Katee Sackhoff, beloved by me as Starbuck, was a series regular on the eighth season. She now starts in Longmire, another show I'm hoping to watch one day.

TV Revolution

I know, I know...it's been a long time since I've written. One might say nearly two years. In that time, I've been quite busy, trying to survive parenthood and writing a food blog, which is also in abeyance at this time. What can I say? I'm doing the best I can.

B and I have finally caught up to the times. Yes, that means we've finally acquired a flat-screen HD TV and a Blu-ray, and even signed up for Netflix. Yes, you read that right. Netflix.

We were the last hold outs, not because we didn't want this stuff, but because we felt we should put our money into other things. But I've been wanting it all for a long time. Far more than my husband, but there you have it.

So, what happened? What changed? Well, our fancy new basement. Yes, we finished our basement. It was quite the undertaking, involving lots of headaches and annoyances. We didn't finish it ourselves (it would never have happened if it had depended upon us to be done). It's an open space with an area for toys, an area for music, and an area for watching TV. We have a 60-inch HD on one wall, with a sectional surrounding a corner, facing the TV. The basement is still relatively unfurnished, but it has the important stuff!

I got to select the TV. Yes, I selected the TV. I repeated it in case you didn't believe me. It's almost impossible to get an HD TV without it being a "smart" TV, with 3-D capability. I didn't initially care one way or the other about the "smart" functions, but they've grown on me. YouTube and Netflix. All very cool.

These changes have mirrored a change in how we view TV.

Let's talk about the past for a minute. Growing up, there were four channels: ABC, NBC, CBS, and PBS. You watched what you could when it was on, otherwise, you missed it. I remember when we got an independent channel - how exciting it all was! Shortly thereafter, we got cable, and we had so many more options. WGN, WTBS, and WOR. And I was a first generation MTV watcher, back when MTV actually showed music videos.

At some point, the VCR was introduced. If you were smart enough you could program it to tape your shows, so you wouldn't miss your shows, so you could go out and have fun, come home and watch your show! It wasn't perfect, but it was better than nothing.

A couple of decades later, the DVR was born. What a wonderful device! We could record not just show by show, but whole seasons. Our DVR allowed us to record two episodes a time even. It was awesome.

But now, it's all upended. Thanks to On Demand and Netflix.

Both have been around for a whole, I admit, and we've had access to On Demand for years. We used to watch movies through On Demand, but this year I've discovered the TV shows On Demand. If my DVR missed a show, I watched it On Demand (except for Person of Interest, which, for reasons beyond me is not On Demand). I've caught up with Burn Notice and watched Elementary solely On Demand. Really cool. Of course, the problem with On Demand is that the cable company can decide to drop the show after a period of time. And they don't have entire seasons.

Netflix, on the other hand, has entire seasons of shows. It's like a candy store for someone like me. So far, B and I have watched Orange is the New Black and Top of the Lake (and highly recommend them), and I've watched most of Call the Midwife (which I also highly recommend). I'm finally going to see Battlestar Galactica, Dr Who, and The Fall. I can't wait! Binging is fun!

Grading the New Season

I can't believe it is nearly Christmas. I also can't believe that Rudolph was shown so soon after Thanksgiving that B and I missed showing it to the kids. We really need a DVD player.

But that means it is time for the annual (more or less) grading of the new season's worth of shows, both old and new shows.

Where to start? How about alphabetical order?

Chuck - This season has seen Morgan derailed as the broken Intersect and Chuck rediscovering his hacker roots. It  turns out that Jeff without carbon monoxide is a rather normal, moral guy who turns Lester in for trying to kill him. Casey finds a love interest as geeky about guns as he is, and our team of spies is now on the run from the federal government. Morgan as the jerk Intersect was a little dull, and bad for a character who had grown on me so much, but the last episode is a return to the best of Chuck. At the end of last season, I gave Chuck a B. I'm giving it a B+ for this season.

Community - Fans of Community were devastated to learn that NBC decided to leave Community off its spring schedule. This failure to schedule is a big indication of the network's lack of trust in this excellent comedy. And this season has been fabulous. Although I feel Britta for some reason has been drawn a little more broadly this season than in the past, the characters are all still funny and unique. Pop culture has never been skewered as well as Community. Granted, it's not everyone's cup of tea, but Community goes from a B to an A.

Fringe - As I've noted before, the disappearance of Peter from the timeline has left a few viewers in the cold, especially considering that this may be this show's final season. I've personally enjoyed watching the evolution of a Peter-less Fringe team, especially with the addition of Lincoln Lee, but I also know that Fringe is always best seen as a season, not even as a half season. I'm lowering it's grade from an A to a B. We'll see if it improves.

House - This is most likely the final season for this show as well - seems to be a theme for this post so far! Cuddy is gone, House is on parole (with Foreman holding his ticket out of jail), and he has two new team members. For the first time ever, House has a female doctor that I like - Park is a socially awkward woman who isn't "hot" and doesn't fit in. The other doctor - the one House met in prison - is fairly typical for the show. I can't even remember the character's name. Thirteen left on a lesbian love affair or to pursue her movie career (I can't remember which), but Taub and Chase remain. House continues to play his mind games on his team and on Wilson, and manages to find a diagnosis for the desparately ill patient in the last five minutes. It's good the show is ending, but it is better than last year, so far. I'm giving it a B+.

Once Upon a Time - I didn't even include this show in my list of what I'd be watching this season. See what happens when you don't get the annual TV Guide Fall Preview issue? It is, of course, right up my alley. Jennifer Morrison (quite annoying as Cameron in House) stars as Emma Swan, who will somehow save our favorite fairy take characters (you know - Snow White, Prince Charming, Jiminy Cricket, the works!) from the Evil Witch's spell. I'll not go further into this other than to say that some Lost producers are behind it. That should make clear that there's no way to explain it all in one blurb. However, I don't want to imply this show is as good or as riveting as Lost - it's not. But it is good - it just needs to find itself. I'll give it a B.

Person of Interest - Okay, I'll confess. this is probably my favorite new show. I'm a little embarrassed, mainly because it's a procedural. There's the usual deep, dark arc that we get little bits and pieces of each week, about both characters, Finch and Reese. Benjamin Linus - oh, wait, I meant Finch, has created a master program that lets the government monitor and prevent terrorist activity. The program also detects your run-of-the-mill planned murders, but the government doesn't care about that. Finch does, so he engages an unemployed Green Beret/CIA agent called Reese. Some people don't like Jim Caviezel's performance as the laconic, intense Reese, but I like it. And I have to say that I would probably pay good money just to watch Michael Emerson to read a phone book, and he doesn't disappoint as the genius Finch with secrets of his own to hide.  I'll give it an A-.

Ringer - this tale of two twins has been written about before in this blog. It's fall finale didn't make the series that much better. C. It killed off the annoying Jemma and Charlie; otherwise, this would be a C- or worse. And yes, I'll still watch it. Get over it.

The Good Wife - This was one of my highest rated shows from last year. Sadly, I can only give it an D or F now, because I'll never see it again! The powers-that-be decided to put this gem of a show on Sundays, after football. I saw the first episode, but the second episode was half Amazing Race. I deleted it (you know I don't watch anything in real time), as I have each subsequent episode. I can report that my mother is not as big a fan this year as she was last year. Hmph.

So, what have you been watching?

Fall Finales - Really?

The last episode of Fringe was promoted as a fall finale. Ringer airs its fall finale this Tuesday. Many shows have promoted their fall finales, promising surprises, thrills, and cliffhangers. I'm not a fan.

It seems that expectations for the final episode of a season are pretty high. A couple of years ago, Bones aired a season finale in which Bones either read a book or Booth dreamed that they were a couple who owned a nightclub. It was a fun episode, had all the squints and Zack in silly roles. It was a trifle, but it was entertaining, which is what a show should be. But oh! the lamentations in the blogosphere - this was no kind of finale.

What? A procedural needs a certain kind of an episode to air for the final episode of the season? That doesn't make sense to me.

Some shows require a finale to be an event. The finales of Buffy the Vampire Slayer always resolved a season-long arc in which the season's "big bad" was finally vanquished, killed, or otherwise neutralized. On the other hand, Lost's finales usually elicited more questions than resolution, but they were for sure events to be anticipated and savored. Lost, of course, produced cliffhangers so we'd return the next season to figure out what it all meant.

One of the best finales I've seen was The Best of Both Worlds of Star Trek: The Next Generation. The tension on board the Enterprise mounted as the Borg kidnapped Picard and turned him into a Borg. It was a bold move for a series that up til then hadn't been very bold.

But I don't require most of the shows I watch to have finales. If they do, so be it, but I won't think less of any show in that category that fails to produce one. Personally, I'd rather have a good episode than a mediocre attempt at a finale.

But now we're expecting shows to have "fall finales"? Are you kidding me?

One of the biggest complaints TV viewers have each year is the month and a half or so that TV turns off. It's the holiday season, and usually starts sometime around Thanksgiving and ends sometime after the New Year's Day. Television programmers have to face the fact that people are very busy during the holidays, going to parties, buying gifts, and mailing greeting cards. So television is placed on hiatus while people are distracted. It makes sense.

We viewers are a demanding lot - we're quite irritated by these breaks in our favorite shows. Some seem to take it quite personally. Finally, some shows like Lost and 24 just waited until the new year to air so that viewers could watch with few if any interruptions.

But now we're expecting shows that air on both sides of the New Year's to have "fall finales"? Please. Fringe's finale showed that Nina Sharp is leading scientists in extracting something from Olivia's body? Wow. Knock me over with a feather. Ringer has promised that they'll reveal something that will change everything.  Whatever.

I guess my primary objection to this is that it just seems like a trick, an illusion that forgets that good story telling is what every show should rely upon to keep viewers. Focus on that, and everything should fall into place. Viewers will come for the good stories, not for the cliffhangers. At least, unless you make them expect it.